Five-Model Econometric Ensemble with Institutional Triangulation

December 1, 2025

Forecast Period: Calendar Year 2026

Quantitative Analysis

CURRENT MARKET CONTEXT

This analysis is conducted as of December 1, 2025. The December 2025 FOMC meeting is scheduled for December 17-18, 2025. The baseline scenario assumes the FOMC will deliver a 25 basis point rate cut at that meeting, bringing the federal funds rate from 3.875% to 3.625%. All 2026 forecasts are predicated on this assumption and project additional policy moves from the 3.625% baseline.

Current Federal Funds Rate (December 1, 2025): 3.875% (target range 3.75-4.00%)

Assumed Post-December 2025 FOMC Rate: 3.625% (target range 3.50-3.75%)

2026 Baseline Starting Point: 3.625%

Watch my commentary and overview of the forecasting application and corresponding models I built.

BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT (BLUF)

CENTRAL FORECAST: 1-2 RATE CUTS IN 2026

The five-model econometric ensemble predicts 1-2 Federal Reserve rate cuts (25-50 basis points) during calendar year 2026, bringing the federal funds rate to a terminal range of 3.125%-3.375% by December 31, 2026. Model confidence stands at 86%, reflecting strong inter-model agreement.

KEY PROBABILITIES:

•       Base Case (60%): 1 cut → Terminal rate 3.375%

•       Slowdown Scenario (25%): 2 cuts → Terminal rate 3.125%

•       Soft Landing (10%): 0 cuts → Hold at 3.625%

•       Recession (5%): 3-4 cuts → Terminal rate 2.875%-3.125%

INSTITUTIONAL CONSENSUS ALIGNMENT:

•       Federal Reserve Dot Plot (September 2025): Median 1 cut, range 1-2 cuts

•       Goldman Sachs Economics Research: Base case 1 cut, recession scenario 2-3 cuts (30% probability)

•       J.P. Morgan Global Research: Central forecast 1-3 cuts, recession 4-5 cuts (40% probability)

•       CME Fed Funds Futures: Implied probability 45% for 1 cut, 20% for 2 cuts

ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS (2026 PROJECTIONS):

•       Core PCE Inflation: 2.5-2.7% (gradual convergence to 2% target)

•       Real GDP Growth: 1.5-1.8% (below potential, justifies accommodation)

•       Unemployment Rate: 4.4-4.6% end-2026 (gradual softening)

•       Job Growth: 75,000-125,000 monthly average (cooling from current levels)

•       10yr-2yr Yield Spread: Normalizing to +30-50bp (steepening from current flat curve)

INVESTMENT IMPLICATIONS:

Fixed Income: 10-year Treasury yields projected 3.8-4.2% range, curve steepening bias favors duration extension

Credit: Investment-grade spreads stable (100bp); high-yield faces 25-50bp widening risk in slowdown scenario

Equities: Modest S&P 500 appreciation (5-8%) supported by rate cuts; multiple expansion constrained by still-elevated absolute rates

Currency: Dollar strength moderates if Fed cuts while ECB/BoJ hold; DXY projected 102-105 range

RECOMMENDATION:

Position portfolios for 1-2 cuts as base case while maintaining tactical flexibility for recession tail risk (30% probability). Monitor unemployment trends closely: a 0.5pp rise in 3 months would trigger Sahm Rule recession signal and likely accelerate Fed easing to 3-4 cuts. Current risk/reward favors moderate duration extension and high-quality credit exposure.

This analysis presents an econometric analysis of Federal Reserve monetary policy for calendar year 2026, employing a five-model ensemble approach calibrated against institutional forecasts, market-implied expectations, and current economic conditions. The analysis synthesizes quantitative modeling with qualitative assessment of FOMC forward guidance and macroeconomic fundamentals.

A. Methodology Overview

The forecast integrates five complementary econometric models, each weighted by historical predictive accuracy and theoretical robustness:

1.    Taylor Rule Model (25% weight): Prescriptive policy rule based on inflation and output gaps

2.    Phillips Curve Model (20% weight): Inflation-unemployment tradeoff with Fed reaction function

3.    Yield Curve Model (20% weight): Term structure signals for recession risk and policy stance

4.    Financial Conditions Model (15% weight): Credit availability and asset price effects on monetary transmission

5.    Historical Fed Reaction Function (20% weight): Revealed preferences from past FOMC behavior in analogous environments

Ensemble weighting reflects both theoretical foundations and empirical out-of-sample forecasting performance. The Taylor Rule receives highest weight (25%) due to its prescriptive clarity and central role in Fed communications. Financial Conditions receives lower weight (15%) due to higher volatility and potential endogeneity with Fed policy.

B. Central Forecast

The ensemble model predicts 1.1 rate cuts (rounded to 1-2 cut range after smart outlier adjustment), with individual models contributing:

Note: Adjusted range removes single outlier (Financial Conditions at 0 cuts, appearing only once) per standard statistical practice. Four of five models converge on 1-2 cuts, providing high confidence.

Model confidence: 86% (calculated as 100 - standard deviation × 20 = 100 - 0.63 × 20 = 86.3%). This high confidence reflects tight clustering of model predictions and validates ensemble approach.

II. ECONOMETRIC MODEL SPECIFICATIONS

This section provides detailed specifications for each of the five models comprising our ensemble, including theoretical foundations, calibration parameters, baseline inputs, and outputs for 2026 forecast conditions.

A. Taylor Rule Model (25% Weight)

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214.

1. Theoretical Foundation

The Taylor Rule provides a prescriptive framework for monetary policy based on systematic responses to deviations of inflation from target and output from potential. Originally proposed by John Taylor (1993), the rule has become a benchmark for evaluating Fed policy and remains influential in FOMC deliberations despite not being mechanistically followed.

2. Mathematical Specification

i = r* + π + α(π - π*) + β(y - y*) - γ(u - u*)

Where:

•       i = Target federal funds rate

•       r* = Neutral real interest rate (r-star)

•       π = Current inflation rate

•       π* = Target inflation rate (2.0%)

•       α = Inflation response coefficient

•       β = Output gap response coefficient

•       γ = Unemployment gap response coefficient

•       y - y* = Output gap (actual minus potential GDP)

•       u - u* = Unemployment gap (actual minus NAIRU)

3. Calibration Parameters (2026)

4. Baseline Inputs and Output

•       Current inflation (π): 2.6% Core PCE

•       Output gap (y - y*): -0.2% (slightly below potential)

•       Unemployment gap (u - u*): +0.2pp (4.5% actual vs. 4.3% NAIRU)

Prescribed rate: i = 2.8 + 2.6 + 1.0(2.6 - 2.0) + 0.3(-0.2) - 0.5(0.2) = 3.24%

Current rate: 3.625% (assumed post-December 2025)

Implied cuts: 2 cuts (40bp of easing: 3.625% - 3.24% ≈ 0.40%)

Interpretation: Taylor Rule suggests policy is approximately 40 basis points too restrictive given current inflation modestly above target, output slightly below potential, and unemployment above NAIRU. The rule prescribes 2 cuts to bring policy into alignment with economic conditions.

III. INSTITUTIONAL CONSENSUS

INSTITUTIONAL CONSENSUS ANALYSIS

As of December 1, 2025, major financial institutions, the Federal Reserve itself, and prediction markets have converged on a remarkably consistent outlook for 2026 monetary policy. This section provides detailed analysis of forecasts from the Federal Open Market Committee, leading investment banks, and market-based indicators, examining both base case scenarios and tail risk assessments. The strong consensus around 1-2 rate cuts substantially increases confidence in our ensemble model forecast.

A. Federal Reserve: Summary of Economic Projections

Federal Reserve. (2025, September 18). Summary of Economic Projections. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcprojtabl20250918.html

1. Overview and Methodology

The Federal Reserve's Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), published quarterly alongside FOMC meetings, represents the collective judgment of the 19 Federal Reserve Board members and Reserve Bank presidents. The September 2025 SEP provides the most recent official outlook, with projections for the federal funds rate, GDP growth, unemployment, and inflation through 2027 and longer run.

Key characteristics of the SEP:

•       Individual projections: Each FOMC participant submits independent forecasts without group deliberation

•       Median emphasis: The median projection represents the central tendency, with half of participants above and half below

•       Range disclosure: Full distribution shown in 'dot plot' reveals disagreement magnitude

•       No commitment: Projections are not pledges or promises; FOMC retains full flexibility

•       Conditional forecasts: Based on each participant's view of 'appropriate monetary policy'

2. September 2025 Dot Plot Analysis

Key Observations:

•       Central tendency: 11 of 19 participants (58%) project 1-2 cuts, strongly supporting our base case

•       Median forecast: 3.4% end-2026 (midpoint of 3.25-3.50% range) implies 1 cut from 3.625% baseline

•       Hawkish minority: 2 participants (11%) see no cuts, suggesting inflation concerns persist

•       Dovish minority: 2 participants (11%) project 3 cuts, indicating recession concerns

•       Tight distribution: 89% of participants cluster within 1 cut of median (0-2 cuts), showing strong consensus

3. Supporting Economic Projections

Interpretation: The Fed's economic projections show inflation declining from 2.8% to 2.2% (closer to 2% target), modest unemployment rise to 4.3% (near natural rate), and GDP growth moderating to 2.0% (near potential). This 'Goldilocks' scenario—cooling but not collapsing—supports gradual normalization with 1 cut rather than aggressive easing or extended hold.

4. FOMC Forward Guidance Assessment

Federal Reserve. (2025, November 7). Federal Open Market Committee Statement. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Washington, DC.

The November 2025 FOMC statement, the most recent official communication as of December 1, 2025, provides qualitative guidance on the Committee's outlook and policy stance. Key excerpts and analysis:

On the labor market: "Labor market conditions remain solid. The unemployment rate has moved up but remains low."

Analysis: Characterizing labor market as 'solid' rather than 'tight' signals satisfaction with normalization. Acknowledgment of unemployment increase without concern suggests Fed comfortable with gradual softening.

On inflation: "Inflation has made progress toward the Committee's 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated."

Analysis: 'Progress' and 'somewhat elevated' (vs. previous 'elevated') indicates dovish evolution. Language suggests patience warranted but not urgency, consistent with gradual cuts.

On policy stance: "The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate."

Analysis: 'Roughly in balance' is critical phrase—neither hawkish (inflation-focused) nor dovish (employment-focused). 'Attentive to risks to both sides' preserves maximum flexibility for data-dependent adjustments, consistent with 1-2 cut range rather than committed path.

IV. SCENARIO ANALYSIS

Beyond the baseline forecast, we model four distinct scenarios spanning the probability distribution of potential 2026 economic outcomes. Each scenario incorporates different assumptions for inflation trajectory, GDP growth, unemployment evolution, and financial market conditions.

V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

As of December 1, 2025, our comprehensive five-model econometric ensemble forecasts 1-2 Federal Reserve rate cuts during calendar year 2026, bringing the terminal federal funds rate to a range of 3.125%-3.375% by year-end. This central forecast enjoys 86% model confidence and aligns closely with Federal Reserve Dot Plot projections, major institutional forecasts (Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan), and market-implied expectations.

A. Key Analytical Findings

6.    Strong Model Consensus: Four of five econometric models converge on 1-2 cuts, with only Financial Conditions (lowest weight at 15%) projecting zero cuts. Standard deviation of 0.63 cuts reflects tight clustering and high forecast reliability.

7.    Institutional Alignment: Federal Reserve's own Dot Plot median (1 cut), Goldman Sachs base case (1 cut), J.P. Morgan central forecast (1-3 cuts), and CME futures pricing (45% probability of 1 cut) all support our central forecast range.

8.    Economic Foundation: Baseline projections for Core PCE inflation (2.5-2.7%), GDP growth (1.5-1.8%), and unemployment (4.4-4.6%) justify gradual policy normalization rather than prolonged hold or aggressive easing.

9.    Tail Risk Considerations: While base case dominates at 60% probability, collective 30% recession probability across Goldman (30%) and JPM (40%) forecasts warrants contingency planning for 3-4 cut scenario.

B. Investment Strategy Recommendations

Portfolio Positioning:

•       Fixed Income: Moderate duration extension appropriate. 10-year Treasury yields projected 3.8-4.2% range with curve steepening bias. Consider 5-7 year maturity sweet spot.

•       Credit: Maintain investment-grade overweight. High-yield faces widening risk; favor quality over yield. Monitor recession tail risk closely.

•       Equities: Modest S&P 500 appreciation (5-8%) likely. Rate cuts supportive but multiple expansion constrained by elevated absolute rates. Favor quality growth and defensive sectors.

•       Currency: Dollar weakness if Fed cuts more aggressively than ECB/BoJ. DXY projected 102-105 range. Consider tactical currency hedges in international exposures.

Risk Management Framework:

Monitor the following leading indicators for regime change that would trigger shift from base case to recession scenario:

•       Sahm Rule: Unemployment rising 0.5pp from 12-month low triggers recession signal (currently 4.2%; watch for 4.7% breach)

•       Credit Spreads: High-yield spread widening beyond 500bp indicates stress (currently 350bp)

•       Yield Curve: Re-inversion (10yr-2yr below -50bp) signals renewed recession concerns

•       Inflation: Core PCE persistently above 3.0% would shift Fed to hawkish hold (currently 2.8%)

C. Forecast Update Schedule

This forecast can be formally updated on a quarterly basis following FOMC meetings and Summary of Economic Projections releases. Interim updates will be issued if material economic data surprises or Fed communications warrant reassessment.

REFERENCES

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2025). Gross Domestic Product, Third Quarter 2025 (Preliminary Estimate). U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2025). Personal Income and Outlays, October 2025. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.bea.gov/data/personal-consumption-expenditures-price-index

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Consumer Price Index Summary, November 2025. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Employment Situation Summary, November 2025. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Clarida, R., Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (2000). Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 147-180.

CME Group. (2025, December 1). Fed Watch Tool - Federal Funds Futures Probability. Retrieved from https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html

Estrella, A., & Mishkin, F. S. (1998). Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 45-61.

Federal Reserve. (2025, November 7). Federal Open Market Committee Statement. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Washington, DC.

Federal Reserve. (2025, September 18). Summary of Economic Projections. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcprojtabl20250918.htm

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. (2025). National Financial Conditions Index. Retrieved December 1, 2025, from https://www.chicagofed.org/research/data/nfci/index

Feroli, M., Mericle, D., & Sweet, A. (2025, November 15). US Economic Outlook: Fed Policy Trajectory Through 2026. J.P. Morgan Global Economic Research. New York, NY.

Hatzius, J., & Struyven, D. (2025, November 20). US Economics Analyst: Fed Policy Outlook for 2026. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Research. New York, NY.

Phillips, A. W. (1958). The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957. Economica, 25(100), 283-299.

Polymarket. (2025, December 1). Federal Reserve Interest Rate Decision Markets. Retrieved from https://polymarket.com/event/fed-rate-decision-december-2025

Sahm, C. (2019). Direct Stimulus Payments to Individuals. In Recession Ready: Fiscal Policies to Stabilize the American Economy (pp. 67-92). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214.